This drawing is 8 x 10 inches, black walnut ink on bristol. I only had a small window to get it done, soI worked fast on this one. It's not quite a "polished" as I usually like, but I'm pleased with it nonetheless.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Pretty frequently I'm startled by my lack of art knowledge. Sure, most people I know really aren't into art, and have little working knowledge of any medium. To them, I'm sure I seem like I really know what I'm talking about most of the time. And to other, more established, experienced artists, my lack of knowledge isn't surprising at all. There is so much to learn that, even you are devoted full-time to learning about art, there is always something new to discover.
Still, I regularly learn something that makes me think, "Wow, how could I not have known that?" The most recent example is pyrrole red. This is a pigment that was developed in the 1980s, so it's been around a while. It's a relatively inexpensive red, cheaper than the expensive cadmiums. I've learned (through internet research) over the past week that it's a great, versatile color, and very bright. Many artists consider it a very important tool.
I don't have this color. I don't have any reds that have this pigment in it. Get this: this color is also nick-named "Ferrari red." Hey! And I'm painting a Ferrari right now. I guess I'd better buy a tube and check it out.
Another thing I think about, related to the above: I feel like the technical aspect of painting was largely glossed over in my university studies. What did we talk about instead? Well, there were a lot of generalities (don't over-mix the colors…perhaps you want to try more muted tones…etc.). Most of all, I think there was discussion of the drawing aspects of painting, such as getting value right (something that, honestly, probably can't be over-emphasized), proportion, paint application and brush strokes.
I can recall very little discussion, however, of opaque pigments vs. transparent pigments, or having on hand cool and warm versions of the same hue. There was certainly little information presented on glazing, which frankly I'm not sure any student I was with ever really attempted.
I'm not at all faulting any of my professors. They had their hands full just trying to coax us into the ability to paint a portrait with vaguely human features, and I am forever in their debt. The information has always been available for me to learn. Maybe I don't really ever learn something until I truly need it.
Monday, May 21, 2012
I put in a little overtime on this drawing over this last weekend; it's another one of the multiple commissions I've accepted for a relatively short space of time. It felt good to get it done! I'm pretty pleased with the outcome. This is 11 x 15 inches.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Here are photos of the playhouse mural I did for some friends. They cleverly turned the recess beneath their basement steps into a play area for their little daughters, with molding around the door and square window, and a peaked “awning” over the door. Then they asked me to paint a house around it.
This is the result. The most time-consuming and tiring part was gridding in the bricks and then painting them in slightly varied reds. I guess they are what I’m proudest of, because they give a nice sense of sunlight and shadow, and I like the effect of having the “near” bricks slightly larger than the “far” bricks to give an illusion of depth.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Whew! I finished the drawing of the school. I’ve crammed in a lot of work over the past couple of weeks. This is black walnut ink, 11 x 15 inches on
This is a combination of washes (at the beginning, to lay down tone), and cross-hatching with dip pens. I used two different kinds of pens; one fine, flexible point, and one a little bigger and more rigid. Both had their uses. I can’t recall what kind they are; the rigid one might have been mapping nib. It wasn’t as good for delicate shading, but it worked much better for scribbling and pushing around the paper.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Monday, May 7, 2012
I just started using some of the black walnut ink I made last November. I have four jars from that batch. The first one I opened was oddly thick. I could still use a paint brush with it, but it was too viscous to use with a dip pen.
The second jar I opened was normal, and worked wonderfully with a dip pen.
I wonder what happened with the first jar? (I haven't checked the other jars yet.) It was pretty weird; not crusty at the top like it had dried out, just uniformly thickened. That jar did have a small film of mold growing in it, but I've had mold in jars of ink before and not had it affect the ink flow. I wonder if the gum Arabic I added did something strange? But if so, why didn't it do that to the second jar?
I might be able to re-thin it with water, and even if I can't, it's not a great loss, and like I said, I can still use it with a brush.
I had the idea of obtaining a large number of small bottles and making ink to sell, but if I do that, I guess I better establish some quality controls!